Discussion:
NOW THAT I'VE DEMONSTRATED THE "POWER AND AWE" OF MY IRON FIST
(too old to reply)
Colonel Edmund J. Burke
2018-08-29 14:16:24 UTC
Permalink
Anybubby else want some?
dullard
Assworm recently got called a dullard. Apparently it made a rather large impression upon his micro-peabrain, and now he can't stop repeating it.
LOL
dolf
2018-08-29 16:34:39 UTC
Permalink
— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 29 August, 2018

For necessary purposes of contextualisation, we convey Nick Scarano's
(Assistant Professor at University of Tübingen, Germany) earlier prudent
meta-ethical, moral / political philosophical observation on "why the
[*ONTOLOGICAL*] '*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*' have a comparable modal {

THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of* *priests*
x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the
'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation =
1092 days x 2 = #2184 days;

THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of Humanity},
which contains the command to behave in accordance with the law, that is,
the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364 days or
365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of 20 March 1996 / New
Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;

THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.

THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: REMEMBER THE
SABBATH DAY TO KEEP IT HOLY

} status to the '*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.' Laws of nature support
counterfactual arguments, too. In order to achieve this, they also must
have a modal status which is higher than simple contingency. The
connections formulated in them are also valid in all natural law governed,
possible worlds, and in this respect, they exhibit the modal status of
necessity. The difference between laws of nature and laws of freedom
appears to consist primarily in the fact that the laws of nature are
concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while the laws
of freedom are concerned with all-quantified, normative bi-conditionals,
each receiving the modal status of necessity.

Actually, the type of necessity spoken of here has to be further specified.
Is it a matter of “logical,” “conceptual,” “nomological,” or “metaphysical”
possible worlds? Scarano (2001, chapter 3.2), argues that our moral
principles have a comparable status to the “metaphysical necessity”. To
Kant has to be ascribed the view that it is herewith a matter of
“conceptual necessity." Scarano sees an indication of this interpretation
in the method he applies in the first and second sections. He presupposes
that the content or the formula of the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE can be found
solely through the means of the conceptual analysis of our *MORAL*
*CONCEPTS*. At the beginning of the decisive argumentation, he writes,
“Regarding this problem we will first try to see whether perhaps the mere
concept of a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE does not also provide us with its
formula” (GMS, 420,18—20). And approximately twenty pages later, he asserts
in retrospect: "Yet that the specified principle of autonomy is the sole
principle of morals may well be established through the mere analysis of
the concepts of morality” (GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). He, therefore,
assumes that he actually was able to extract the formula of the supreme
moral principle solely through a conceptual analysis.

In my opinion, such a proceeding allows only one conclusion: *IF* *THE*
*MORAL* *PRINCIPLE* *CAN* *BE* *PRODUCED* *SOLELY* *THROUGH* *AN*
*ANALYTICAL* *PROCEDURE* *ON* *OUR* *CONCEPT* *OF* *MORALITY*, *THEN* *IT*
*WOULD* *HAVE* *THE* *STATUS* *OF* *CONCEPTUAL* *NECESSITY*. According to
Kant, the founding law of the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE is valid in all
conceptually possible worlds. The queson of which type of necessity moral
principles exhibit, however, is not essential for the ensuing reflections.
[Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]

2.3 NECESSITY {OBEDIENT}, NORMATIVITY {AIDING} AND APRIORITY {ASSISTING}
A possible but easily avoidable equivocation in the expression [*ONTIC*]
necessity can be cleared up at this juncture. Sometimes the expression is
used in the realm of morality as a synonym of normativity or
prescriptivity. Consequently, actions are necessary if they connote a
“should” or if it is our *DUTY* {

VIS-A-VIS the prescription conveyed by SECTION VIII to Queen Victoria's
Letters Patent of 29 October 1900 as instrumentation to the Federation of
the Australian Commonwealth of 1901: And We do hereby REQUIRE and COMMAND
ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE
INHABITANTS of Our said Commonwealth TO BE *OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, AND
*ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General

} to carry them out. This type of usage is also found in Kant. In the
central “third proposition” of the first part of the Groundwork, this usage
is clearly expressed: “*DUTY* *IS* *THE* *NECESSITY* *OF* *AN* *ACTION*
*FROM* *RESPECT* *FOR* *THE* *LAW*” (GMS, 400,18 f.). While the [*ONTIC*]
necessity analyzed previously refers to the moral principles, it is here a
matter of the necessity of the action itself. However this aspect is
terminologically classified, whether as “normative,” “prescriptive,”
“evaluative,” or whether one speaks of the imperative character of moral
judgments, it may be distinctly distinguished from the modal-logical
concept of necessity responsible for the counterfactual variations.

In the preliminary formulations (P1) through (P3), this logical quality has
yet to be expressed. In (Pl') the modal status of necessity, therefore, is
explicitly taken up into the formulation:

(P1') Necessarily, for all objects x:
if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion C, does x have the moral quality
M.

Applied to Kantian ethics, this thought results in the following
formulation of Kant’s fundamental principle:

(P2') Necessarily, for all actions x: .
if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion CI, does x satisfy the demand of
morality.

The proposition (P3) is also to be completed accordingly:

(P3') Necessarily, for all maxims x and all actions y:
if, and only if, the underlying maxim x of the action y has the quality
that the actor of y can will at the same time that x becomes a general law,
does y satisfy the demand of morality.

In the propositions (Pl') through (P3') this aspect — that is, necessity in
the sense of “normative,” “prescriptive,” or “evaluative” — is indeed
contained. There it is connected, however, to the moral predicate, not the
operator of necessity. When I speak of necessity in the following sections,
I mean a modal quality of judgments and not the specificum of normativity.

Kant uses the expression necessity with yet other meanings. Every
interpretation depends on the clarification in each particular context of
what Kant exactly intends in those corresponding places and of how each
particular argument is to be reconstructed. Next to

(a) the type of usage as a modal operator that makes counterfactual
considerations possible and
(b) the usage in the sense of an imperative character, thus in the sense of
“normativity” or “prescriptivity,” there is
(c) an often encountered usage with an epistemological meaning.

If expression is used in this sense, then it means as much as “necessary
know-ability,” that is, the independence of knowledge from contingent,
empirical factors. Typically, Kant uses the expression a priori for
judgments that exhibit this characteristic. Since this type of usage also
can be clearly distinguished from the modal one, I will speak of apriority
to designate this epistemological aspect. I will use necessity solely in
the first sense (a).

Kant doubtlessly sees a close connection between necessity and apriority.
He often moves quickly from the one concept to the other without grounding
the transition. The two concepts, however, originate from varying spheres.
While necessity is a matter of the modal status of judgments, apriority is
an epistemological concept. In the former case, the concern is the
application of predicates to objects of other possible worlds. In the later
case, it is a matter of the knowability of the relevant judgments. Between
the two concepts there does not seem to be a close conceptual connection.
In particular cases it must be explicitly argued for that apriority follows
from necessity.

Even if Kant sees a very close connection between the two concepts, he does
not appear to assume that necessity and apriority are exchangeable
concepts. In the central passage of the Preface. he formulates rather an
argument for their connection. In the following section, Scarano sketches
out a possible reconstruction of the argumentation's structure on the basis
of the conceptual differences just worked out. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
Groundwork, Page 11-12]

As there being a prerequisite for hypothetical and conjectural postulate of
such cognitive reality which I have desire to grasp (ie. there may be
semantical misapprehensions: mais nous faisons de notre mieux) is a notion
of contingency as a quantum sensibility within the context of a
metaphysical philosophical derivation where there is a normative absence or
a substitution of *ONTIC* necessity as the factuality of being so without
being so and which whilst absent of quantitative certainty yet has a
provisional possibility for occurrence or eventuality.

And we note at this juncture that the signs-‘OTH {#2184 / #364 - ADMITTANCE
{

#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]

IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}

DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE

} v’s #2184 / #312 - RESISTANCE {

#10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 - Totality
of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]

} #2184 / #728 - REACTANCE {

#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature / #1 - Nature Contains Nature: {DOUBLE:
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature {#6 - Form of Nature}}

}} become reversed in the admittance domain; ie. capacitive susceptance is
positive and inductive susceptance is negative.

ADMITTANCE {YANG CH'I AS MALE} AND RESISTANCE {YIN AS FEME}
Within electrical engineering, admittance is a measure of how easily a
circuit or device will allow a current to flow. It is defined as the
reciprocal of impedance.

Resistance is a measure of the opposition of a circuit to the flow of a
steady current, while impedance takes into account not only the resistance
but also dynamic effects which are known as ‘OTH {#2184 / #3}: #728 -
REACTANCE {

#9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability} [#671 / #5 - Act of
Nature]

DEFINE THE @5 CANONICAL PRINCIPLE EQUILIBRIUM CHARACTERISTIC HERE

) is here conveyed as substantial form (forma substantialis) by liability.
Likewise, admittance is not only a measure of the ease with which a steady
current can flow, but also the dynamic effects of the material's
susceptance to the contingent eventuality of polarisation.

Within electrical and electronic systems, reactance is the opposition of a
circuit element to a change in current or voltage, due to that element's
inductance or capacitance. The notion of reactance is similar to electrical
resistance, but it differs in several respects.

Thus I wish to obtain as semantical construct some philosophical conception
about the notion of contingency as to the dynamic effect of reactance and
the materia prima susceptibility to eventuality of polarisation as materia
secunda as an alternative canonical approach to mathematically expressing
these normative {ie. YANG CH'I as MALE / YIN as FEME} bi-conditionals in
terms of an electrical circuit:

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH} - Share the same
ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the same
light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 - TORAH} -
Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect each
other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.

<Loading Image...>

<Loading Image...>

[IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:

Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).

*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage / sovereign
dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus} Empire
Governance] 

As to what constitutes the substantial form (forma substantialis) of the
formal cause (causa formalis) as to the quintessential first material
(materia prima: Anthropic Cosmological Principle as the absolute
generalized basis of all subsequent individualization that is utterly
potential and is devoid of all attributes or qualities) which is then the
*MIND* as intellectualised universal form (universalia forma), idea, shape
or pattern of the essential or natural image of God (imago Dei essentialis
sive naturalis: that archetypal principal perfections of righteousness,
holiness and wisdom as the likeness or resemblance to God in which man was
originally created).

H5674@{
   @1: Sup: 76 (#76); Ego: 76 (#76),
   @2: Sup: 65 (#141); Ego: 70 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @3: Sup: 67 (#208); Ego: 2 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#232); Ego: 38 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   @5: Sup: 74 (#306); Ego: 50 (#236),
   @6: Sup: 80 (#386); Ego: 6 (#242),
   Male: #386; Feme: #242
} // #728

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #728 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;

THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *INCONSTANT* *MIND*.

    #VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
    #TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
    #POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
    #TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
    #CANON: #186

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
   @1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
   @2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186

#728 as [#400, #70, #2, #200, #50, #6] = `abar (H5674): {UMBRA: #5 as #728
% #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *PASS* *OVER* *OR* *BY* *OR* *THROUGH*, alienate,
bring, carry, do away, take, take away, transgress; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to pass
over, cross, cross over, pass over, march over, overflow, go over; 1a2) to
pass beyond; 1a3) to pass through, traverse; 1a3a) passers-through
(participle); 1a3b) *TO* *PASS* *THROUGH* (*THE* *PARTS* *OF* *VICTIM* *IN*
*COVENANT*);

“Then gathered the chief priests and the Pharisees {set apart} a council,
and said, What do we? For this man doeth many miracles.

If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: {

“[Ye] #351 - serpents, [ye] #33 - generation of vipers, how can ye escape
the #312 - damnation of hell?” [Matthew 23:33 (KJV)]

“Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O #33
- generation of #351 - vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the #312 -
wrath to come?” [Luke 3:7 (KJV)]

} and the Romans {strength; power} shall come and take away both our place
and nation.

And one of them, named Caiaphas {he that seeks with diligence; one that
vomiteth}, being the high priest that same year, said unto them, Ye know
nothing at all,

Nor consider that it is expedient for us, *THAT* *ONE* *MAN* *SHOULD* *DIE*
*FOR* *THE* *PEOPLE*, and that the whole nation perish not.

And this spake he not of himself: but being high priest that year, he
prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation;

And not for that nation only, but that also he should gather together in
one the children of God that were scattered abroad.

Then from that day forth they took counsel together for to put him to death
{

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

YOUTUBE: "Battle Hymn of the Republic"



The 33 #CENTRE of the first square is the KING as SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE
dynamic which corresponds to the historic reality of the crucifixion of
Christ on AROUND 1500 HOURS ON FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.

} Jesus therefore walked no more openly among the Jews; but went thence
unto a country near to the wilderness, into a city called Ephraim
{fruitful; increasing: #15 CE ... #34 CE ... #65 CE ... #111 CE ... #175 CE
... 260 CE ... #369 CE}, and there continued with his disciples.

And the Jews' passover was nigh at hand: and many went out of the country
up to Jerusalem {vision of peace / Jerusha: banished; possession;
inheritance} before the passover, to purify themselves.” [John 11:47-55
(KJV}

1a4) to pass along, pass by, overtake and pass, sweep by; 1a4a) passer-by
(participle); 1a4b) to be past, be over; 1a5) to pass on, go on, pass on
before, go in advance of, pass along, travel, advance; 1a6) to pass away;
1a6a) to emigrate, leave (one's territory); 1a6b) to vanish; 1a6c) to
perish, cease to exist; 1a6d) to become invalid, become obsolete (of law,
decree); 1a6e) to be alienated, pass into other hands; 1b) (Niphal) to be
crossed; 1c) (Piel) to impregnate, cause to cross; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to
cause to pass over, cause to bring over, cause to cross over, make over to,
dedicate, devote; 1d2) to cause to pass through; 1d3) to cause to pass by
or beyond or under, let pass by; 1d4) to cause to pass away, cause to take
away; 1e) (Hithpael) to pass over;

Which then results in the second matter (materia secunda) as the basis for
all material existence (essentia: indicates the entire whatness of a thing
including the materiality or spirituality as its substantia) as the
integrity and authenticity of being within the world and living in
compliance (status integritatis) as obedience with the terms of the innate
*MORAL* (lex moralis primordialis).

“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]

"I AM FROM ABOVE {#41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your parents
... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy ...
#205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear false witness ... #287 - Covet Not ...
#328 ... #369}: YE ARE OF THIS WORLD {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: #260) ...
#34 (@7: #175) ...
#65 (@2: #34) ...
#111 (@3: #65) ...
#175 (@4: #369) ...
#260 (@8: #111) ...
#369 (@9: #15)

}; I AM NOT OF THIS WORLD.” [John 8:23 (KJV)]

"AND JESUS ANSWERING SAID UNTO THEM, THE CHILDREN {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as
BELIAL - ANKH / ROMAN} OF THIS WORLD MARRY {#ONE: #99 / #297 <-- *AS* *THE*
*FOUNDATION* *STONE* (*USURPING* @1 = *SOVEREIGN* / #CENTRE @5 = *LAST*
*WILL*, *TESTAMENT* *OF* #INR *BEING* *THE* *BINDING* *NORM* (*NORMA*
*OBLIGANS* ) *ON* #33 AD) *MAGIC* *SQUARE

@1 - #17 - 2017
@2 - #33 - #INR
@3 - #65 - SOLDIER
@4 - #390 - WREATHS / CROWN / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776

@5 - #288 - UMBRA / BEERSHEBA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)
@6 - #419 - SLAUGHTER
@7 - #391 - HOMOIOS
@8 - #13 - Letters Patent
@9 - #21 - Bequeathed to Sovereign Heirs in perpetuity

@10 - #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration; I-Ching: H40 -
Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21 - Release;

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE}

#1 (9) - OUHOUYAH (King-Seraphim) = #1
#9 (8) - HAZIEL (King-Cherubim) = #10
#17 (7) - LEVYAH (King-Throne) = #27 <-- SOVEREIGNTY / PYTHAGOREAN TERNIO
ANAGRAM TO #INR
#25 (6) - NETEHYAH (King-Dominion) = #52 <-- *THEY* *ARE* *AS* *THE* *SONS*
*OF* *DARKNESS* *NOT* *THE* *SONS* *OF* *LIGHT* / *GOD* *AS* #123

#33 (5) - YHOUYAH (King-Powers) = #85 <-- ADAMANT {ie. fixed mind /
dogmatic} / DIAMOND 💍
#41 (4) - HEHAHEL (King-Virtues) = #126
#49 (3) - OHOUEL (King-Principalities) = #175 <-- *VENUS* (7x7 = #49 /
#175) *USE* *OF* *MARRIAGE* *AS* *AN* *ANTHROPIC* *PROTOTYPE*

#57 (2) - NEMAMYAH (King-Archangels) = #232
#65 - *SOLDIER* (1) - DAMBYAN (King-Angels) = #297

VIRTUE as MIND: {#1 + #2 = #3} +
TOOLS as SCIENCE: {#3 + #4 = #7} +
POSITION as OPINION: {#5 + #6 = #11 as Collegium of Pontiffs from 510 BCE
as AS PONTIFICATED DEIFIED IGNORANCE BEING NARCISSISM} +
TIME as SENSE: {#7 + #8 = #15}

= #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law +
H9 - System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity)

6x6 = #36 / #111 / #666 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}

45 5 61
53 37 21
13 69 29

= #111 / #333 {#FIVE}

Whilst it may continue to function as an acceptable METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI
TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} with an encapsulated sphere of
operation, it is entirely a specious notion to declare it is the root and
causal basis of the perennialist philosophical tradition:

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE}

42 2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}

43 3 59
51 35 19
11 67 27 = #105 / #315 {#THREE}

#419 as [#9, #2, #8, #400] = tabach (H2873): {#2 as #19 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315} 1) to slaughter, slay, butcher, kill
ruthlessly; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter, butcher; 1a2) to slay, kill
ruthlessly (figurative);

44 4 60
52 36 20
12 68 28 = #108 / #324 {#FOUR}

#419 as [#2, #1, #6, #400, #10] = 'avvah (H185): {#0 as #12 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH*/ *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #FOUR: #108 / #324} 1) desire, lust, will (not necessarily
evil);

49 9 65
57 41 25
17 73 33 = #123 / #369 {#NINE} AS IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73
SUBSTITUTION}

74 81 76
79 77 75
78 73 80 = #231 - #108 = #123 / #693 - #369 = #324 {#TEN} AS RETURN TO
GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE BEING ITSELF

My objection has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 /
#33 - #INR / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5 - substituted HETEROS ethic upon our {#390
/ #288 / #419} war dead and usurping the @1 - SOVEREIGNTY of the #391 -
HOMOIOS basis to our Commonwealth’s Governance which is defined as a
PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 / #37} by Queen Victoria’s
Letters Patent of 17 September 1900 as the instrumentation of Federation
into a nation.

}, AND ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE {#175 AS ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE}: BUT THEY WHICH
SHALL BE ACCOUNTED WORTHY TO OBTAIN THAT WORLD, AND THE RESURRECTION FROM
THE DEAD, NEITHER MARRY, NOR ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE: NEITHER CAN THEY DIE
ANY MORE: FOR THEY ARE EQUAL UNTO THE ANGELS; AND ARE THE CHILDREN OF GOD {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] *OR* *SONS* *OF* *GOD* [*FOR*
*ANGELS*]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie
sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*,
*CLASS*;

}, BEING THE CHILDREN OF THE RESURRECTION." [Luke 20:34-36 (KJV)]

Which as a habit and capacity of will by its exercise of intellect as being
primarily intentioned to be regulated by the innate understanding which
grasps the basic principles of the *MORAL* law and spontaneously acts
according to the dictates as wants and desires of conscientia) and the
natural law (ie. the universal *MORAL* law either impresses by God upon the
*MIND* of all the people or immediately discerned by the reason in its
encounter with the order of nature) as a covenant of nature (foedus
naturae: predicated on the original integrity of human nature and its
capacity for obedience under the terms if the innate *MORAL* or natural
law) bestowed upon us by the graciousness of God.

STRATEGIC: SUCCESS AND MATERIAL GAIN
VIII - And We do hereby REQUIRE and COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS,
CIVIL AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS of Our said Commonwealth
TO BE OBEDIENT, AIDING, AND ASSISTING unto Our said Governor General, or,
in the event of his death, INCAPACITY, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, FROM TIME TO TIME, under the PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR
LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER THE GOVERNMENT of Our said Commonwealth.

Thanks for your assistance!

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 29 August 2018

#CONTINGENCY #DEATH #INCAPACITY
Post by Colonel Edmund J. Burke
Anybubby else want some?
dullard
Assworm recently got called a dullard. Apparently it made a rather large
impression upon his micro-peabrain, and now he can't stop repeating it.
LOL
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Loading...