Another update of sexual harmonic(s) adjustment criteria

[David Dalton]

Since I have made some significant changes recently,
here is an update. When I say currently committed
it means at the time the adjustment ends, not as I
type this, but I hope that the adjustments will occur
within the next twelve hours.

The sexual harmonic(s) adjustment criteria are now:

1. For incompatible or partially compatible relationships
involving one (A) or two (F) a.s.r., if they are currently
committed and (a) have been committed for at least
the last 5 months with no temporary breakup of more
than three weeks and/or (b) at least one of them has at
least one child under 17, including adoptive or fetus
or even embryo, then they will become optimally sexually
compatible in (A,F)-HDBE.

2. For incompatible or partially compatible relationships
not involving any a.s.r., if they are currently committed and
(a) have been committed for at least the last year with
no temporary breakup of more than two weeks and/or
(b) at least one of them has at least one child under 16,
including adoptive or fetus or even embryo, then they
will become optimally sexually compatible in R-HDBE.

Again, as I said months ago, a firm promise of adoption
to a child under 17 for (A,F) or 16 (for R) that is in effect at
the conclusion of (A,F)-HDBE or R-HDBE, whichever applies,
would be sufficient, but note that I hope that
(A,F)-HDBE will be applied within the next several hours
and sexuality aspects of RHDBE within the next twelve hours.

It is also extended to marriage groups of more than two.
For example, two fence jumping gay--lesbian couples
might become (2bim+bimT+straight-type-2-F) or
(bifT+straight-type-2-M+2bif) and in either case
all four would be optimally sexually compatible
with one another.

[David Dalton]

Post by David Dalton
Since I have made some significant changes recently,
here is an update. When I say currently committed
it means at the time the adjustment ends, not as I
type this, but I hope that the adjustments will occur
within the next twelve hours.
1. For incompatible or partially compatible relationships
involving one (A) or two (F) a.s.r., if they are currently
committed and (a) have been committed for at least
the last 5 months with no temporary breakup of more
than three weeks and/or (b) at least one of them has at
least one child under 17, including adoptive or fetus
or even embryo, then they will become optimally sexually
compatible in (A,F)-HDBE.
2. For incompatible or partially compatible relationships
not involving any a.s.r., if they are currently committed and
(a) have been committed for at least the last year with
no temporary breakup of more than two weeks and/or
(b) at least one of them has at least one child under 16,
including adoptive or fetus or even embryo, then they
will become optimally sexually compatible in R-HDBE.
Again, as I said months ago, a firm promise of adoption
to a child under 17 for (A,F) or 16 (for R) that is in effect at
the conclusion of (A,F)-HDBE or R-HDBE, whichever applies,
would be sufficient, but note that I hope that
(A,F)-HDBE will be applied within the next several hours
and sexuality aspects of RHDBE within the next twelve hours.
It is also extended to marriage groups of more than two.
For example, two fence jumping gay--lesbian couples
might become (2bim+bimT+straight-type-2-F) or
(bifT+straight-type-2-M+2bif) and in either case
all four would be optimally sexually compatible
with one another.

With the changes for (A,F)-HDBE, there will be very no
single categories 1--10 a.s.r. women, and the only ones
that might have me as a special guest are the several
involved with one or more lesbians (or soon lesbianT
in the case of Sarah). But I suppose there are non-a.s.r.
bifs out there, though there are certain sexual advantages
to being an a.s.r. (and certain sexual advantages to being
involved with me or an a.s.r.). Also since I am 60,
maybe I can get involved with three 20 year old bifs
(just kidding, plus my vow to wait four weeks for
Sarah still applies).

Also Emmylou Harris’s male partner will become straight-type-2-M
so the match of her and Tony Ploughman is no longer valid.

[David Dalton]

Post by David Dalton

Post by David Dalton
Since I have made some significant changes recently,
here is an update. When I say currently committed
it means at the time the adjustment ends, not as I
type this, but I hope that the adjustments will occur
within the next twelve hours.
1. For incompatible or partially compatible relationships
involving one (A) or two (F) a.s.r., if they are currently
committed and (a) have been committed for at least
the last 5 months with no temporary breakup of more
than three weeks and/or (b) at least one of them has at
least one child under 17, including adoptive or fetus
or even embryo, then they will become optimally sexually
compatible in (A,F)-HDBE.
2. For incompatible or partially compatible relationships
not involving any a.s.r., if they are currently committed and
(a) have been committed for at least the last year with
no temporary breakup of more than two weeks and/or
(b) at least one of them has at least one child under 16,
including adoptive or fetus or even embryo, then they
will become optimally sexually compatible in R-HDBE.
Again, as I said months ago, a firm promise of adoption
to a child under 17 for (A,F) or 16 (for R) that is in effect at
the conclusion of (A,F)-HDBE or R-HDBE, whichever applies,
would be sufficient, but note that I hope that
(A,F)-HDBE will be applied within the next several hours
and sexuality aspects of RHDBE within the next twelve hours.
It is also extended to marriage groups of more than two.
For example, two fence jumping gay--lesbian couples
might become (2bim+bimT+straight-type-2-F) or
(bifT+straight-type-2-M+2bif) and in either case
all four would be optimally sexually compatible
with one another.

With the changes for (A,F)-HDBE, there will be very no

Ha, I was going to write “very few”, but it is actually “no”.

Post by David Dalton
single categories 1--10 a.s.r. women, and the only ones
that might have me as a special guest are the several
involved with one or more lesbians (or soon lesbianT
in the case of Sarah). But I suppose there are non-a.s.r.
bifs out there, though there are certain sexual advantages
to being an a.s.r. (and certain sexual advantages to being
involved with me or an a.s.r.). Also since I am 60,
maybe I can get involved with three 20 year old bifs
(just kidding, plus my vow to wait four weeks for
Sarah still applies).
Also Emmylou Harris’s male partner will become straight-type-2-M
so the match of her and Tony Ploughman is no longer valid.

[David Dalton]

Post by David Dalton
Since I have made some significant changes recently,
here is an update. When I say currently committed
it means at the time the adjustment ends, not as I
type this, but I hope that the adjustments will occur
within the next twelve hours.
1. For incompatible or partially compatible relationships
involving one (A) or two (F) a.s.r., if they are currently
committed and (a) have been committed for at least
the last 5 months with no temporary breakup of more
than three weeks and/or (b) at least one of them has at
least one child under 17, including adoptive or fetus
or even embryo, then they will become optimally sexually
compatible in (A,F)-HDBE.
2. For incompatible or partially compatible relationships
not involving any a.s.r., if they are currently committed and
(a) have been committed for at least the last year with
no temporary breakup of more than two weeks and/or
(b) at least one of them has at least one child under 16,
including adoptive or fetus or even embryo, then they
will become optimally sexually compatible in R-HDBE.
Again, as I said months ago, a firm promise of adoption
to a child under 17 for (A,F) or 16 (for R) that is in effect at
the conclusion of (A,F)-HDBE or R-HDBE, whichever applies,
would be sufficient, but note that I hope that
(A,F)-HDBE will be applied within the next several hours
and sexuality aspects of RHDBE within the next twelve hours.
It is also extended to marriage groups of more than two.
For example, two fence jumping gay--lesbian couples
might become (2bim+bimT+straight-type-2-F) or
(bifT+straight-type-2-M+2bif) and in either case
all four would be optimally sexually compatible
with one another.

Some changes:

In (2) above, change 16 to 16 and 2/3.

In the sexual harmonics adjustments I said that newly
optimally sexually compatible relationships (and also
existing same sex relationships) would not lock until
next sex even if they have had sex before. That has
changed. Committed relationships that become
optimally sexually compatible and have had sex
before will be locked right away, not just after next
sex. The same is true for existing committed same
sex relationships (for the most recent sex in a
committed relationship).

Also there is some further relaxing. Couples that are
separated but not divorced and are not committed
to other(s) and otherwise meet the above criteria
will become optimally sexually compatible and if
they have had sex in the past they will be locked.
The same will be true for couples who are divorced
and have shared custody and are not committed
to other(s). I don’t know if that applies to Sarah
McLachlan and her ex-husband Ashwin Sood.

[David Dalton]

Post by David Dalton

Post by David Dalton
Since I have made some significant changes recently,
here is an update. When I say currently committed
it means at the time the adjustment ends, not as I
type this, but I hope that the adjustments will occur
within the next twelve hours.
1. For incompatible or partially compatible relationships
involving one (A) or two (F) a.s.r., if they are currently
committed and (a) have been committed for at least
the last 5 months with no temporary breakup of more
than three weeks and/or (b) at least one of them has at
least one child under 17, including adoptive or fetus
or even embryo, then they will become optimally sexually
compatible in (A,F)-HDBE.
2. For incompatible or partially compatible relationships
not involving any a.s.r., if they are currently committed and
(a) have been committed for at least the last year with
no temporary breakup of more than two weeks and/or
(b) at least one of them has at least one child under 16,
including adoptive or fetus or even embryo, then they
will become optimally sexually compatible in R-HDBE.
Again, as I said months ago, a firm promise of adoption
to a child under 17 for (A,F) or 16 (for R) that is in effect at
the conclusion of (A,F)-HDBE or R-HDBE, whichever applies,
would be sufficient, but note that I hope that
(A,F)-HDBE will be applied within the next several hours
and sexuality aspects of RHDBE within the next twelve hours.
It is also extended to marriage groups of more than two.
For example, two fence jumping gay--lesbian couples
might become (2bim+bimT+straight-type-2-F) or
(bifT+straight-type-2-M+2bif) and in either case
all four would be optimally sexually compatible
with one another.

In (2) above, change 16 to 16 and 2/3.
In the sexual harmonics adjustments I said that newly
optimally sexually compatible relationships (and also
existing same sex relationships) would not lock until
next sex even if they have had sex before. That has
changed. Committed relationships that become
optimally sexually compatible and have had sex
before will be locked right away, not just after next
sex. The same is true for existing committed same
sex relationships (for the most recent sex in a
committed relationship).
Also there is some further relaxing. Couples that are
separated but not divorced and are not committed
to other(s) and otherwise meet the above criteria
will become optimally sexually compatible and if
they have had sex in the past they will be locked.
The same will be true for couples who are divorced
and have shared custody and are not committed
to other(s). I don’t know if that applies to Sarah
McLachlan and her ex-husband Ashwin Sood.

The shared custody would have to be of at least one child
under 17 (A,F) or 16 and 2/3 (R).

Also some relationships are too abusive and will be split
across species boundaries.

[David Dalton]

Post by David Dalton

Post by David Dalton
Since I have made some significant changes recently,
here is an update. When I say currently committed
it means at the time the adjustment ends, not as I
type this, but I hope that the adjustments will occur
within the next twelve hours.
1. For incompatible or partially compatible relationships
involving one (A) or two (F) a.s.r., if they are currently
committed and (a) have been committed for at least
the last 5 months with no temporary breakup of more
than three weeks and/or (b) at least one of them has at
least one child under 17, including adoptive or fetus
or even embryo, then they will become optimally sexually
compatible in (A,F)-HDBE.
2. For incompatible or partially compatible relationships
not involving any a.s.r., if they are currently committed and
(a) have been committed for at least the last year with
no temporary breakup of more than two weeks and/or
(b) at least one of them has at least one child under 16,
including adoptive or fetus or even embryo, then they
will become optimally sexually compatible in R-HDBE.
Again, as I said months ago, a firm promise of adoption
to a child under 17 for (A,F) or 16 (for R) that is in effect at
the conclusion of (A,F)-HDBE or R-HDBE, whichever applies,
would be sufficient, but note that I hope that
(A,F)-HDBE will be applied within the next several hours
and sexuality aspects of RHDBE within the next twelve hours.
It is also extended to marriage groups of more than two.
For example, two fence jumping gay--lesbian couples
might become (2bim+bimT+straight-type-2-F) or
(bifT+straight-type-2-M+2bif) and in either case
all four would be optimally sexually compatible
with one another.

In (2) above, change 16 to 16 and 2/3.
In the sexual harmonics adjustments I said that newly
optimally sexually compatible relationships (and also
existing same sex relationships) would not lock until
next sex even if they have had sex before. That has
changed. Committed relationships that become
optimally sexually compatible and have had sex
before will be locked right away, not just after next
sex. The same is true for existing committed same
sex relationships (for the most recent sex in a
committed relationship).
Also there is some further relaxing. Couples that are
separated but not divorced and are not committed
to other(s) and otherwise meet the above criteria
will become optimally sexually compatible and if
they have had sex in the past they will be locked.
The same will be true for couples who are divorced
and have shared custody and are not committed
to other(s). I don’t know if that applies to Sarah
McLachlan and her ex-husband Ashwin Sood.

The 16 and 2/3 has changed to 16.8.

The locks have formed, except there is a wide lock,
which I discussed years ago, among the group
me+a.s.r. So except for cases where an a.s.r.
already has a non-a.s.r. primary committed often
newly optimally sexually compatible partner and
they have had sex in the past, in which
case such pairs are locked, now those in the group me+a.s.r.
can only be involved with other(s) in that group, which
could include one with such an outside partner,
and not necessarily with the permission of the
outside partner, though the outside partner would
have to get permission from the a.s.r. to be
involved with any other non-a.s.r. And for
locked 1--1 relationships of two non-a.s.r. each
would have to get permission from the other
to be involved with any other non-a.s.r. (even
partially compatible, now).

Or perhaps this is just a rationalization of why I still
have attraction to several categories 3--4, 6--9 women,
and I will have to try again on September 5. But
for now I will carry on with my latest four components
attempt, which might be complete by dawn.

But if the above is true, e.g. Sarah McLachlan should
now be attracted to and attractive to just her non-a.s.r. lesbianT
boyfriend and to Beothuk straight-type-2 men, lesbians,
and other bifs in the group me+a.s.r., including me.,
and not to any other non-a.s.r., non-Beothuk (which
includes all those who Goddess considers to be
her stalkers), or straight-type-1 men or bims. I think
her musical ability is such that she won’t suffer from
the loss of sexual attraction.

Another note is that after [SSA] I asked Goddess as
usual if there were now 55 species in ghuman species
group, and divined that the answer was no. I then
though it would be (and guessed) lower numbers,
but it turns out the number is 60. Also the tendency
to associate within one of those 60 species is
now 1.2 times the tendency to associate in homo
sapiens, and the tendency to associate across
species boundaries is 0.9 times that in homo sapiens
(and of course there is no sexual compatibility across
species boundaries). But an exception is that
those in the other 59 species will like artwork (including
music) of those in Beothuk species just as much
as that of those in their own species (so the 1.2,
which I previously may have said was 3). Also
those with matchmaking ability (me and the a.s.r.)
should be able to distinguish species even before
physical markings form, and that may be useful in
custody disputes, where children will have gone
into the species of the one granted custody by Goddess
(of course in some cases there may be shared custody).